Top of the most economical suv in terms of fuel consumption

>

When choosing a new large car, many buyers are wondering which of the SUVs is the most reliable, economical and inexpensive in terms of content. After all, the bulk of the money spent on a car goes to a gas station visit. Given the current trend of active growth in the cost of fuel, even wealthy people think about the issue of maintaining their own budget by reducing the cost of maintaining an SUV or large crossovers. In order to make a choice, a special top of the most economical off-road vehicles for fuel consumption was drawn up.

Rating of the most economical SUVs

TOP most economical SUVs.

Читать далее про рейтинг самых экономичных внедорожников-->

Groups of applicants

Since now the concept of an SUV has become quite blurry, we have selected for you the most economical large jeeps and more compact models, which should rather be attributed to full-sized crossovers. All these cars deserve to be called SUVs, because they have the necessary characteristics for this. It is obvious that people want to find an economical SUV especially in order to reduce the costs that go to regular visits to gas stations.

Gradually, the fashion for huge jeeps, whole houses on wheels, which ate at least 15 - 20 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers, passes. It is right and necessary at the same time. Modern budget SUVs are able to provide the same pleasure from driving a big car. In this case, the driver does not have to think only about how to get to the nearest gas station without stalling due to a sharp drop in the level of fuel in the tank.

Economy SUVs

Rating Representatives

In the ranking of economical SUVs were representatives from different parts of the world. This once again confirms the fact that all modern automakers are making every effort to create economical, but dynamic cars. Few car owners will want to sacrifice for the sake of low fuel consumption those benefits that give big jeeps and crossovers. It makes no sense to buy a car in this segment, which will not be able to accelerate normally and provide increased throughput.

Therefore, in the rating we tried to select not just the most economical SUVs, but the cars that retained all the advantages of such cars, but allowing them to look much less often at the fuel status indicator in the tank. Representatives of the following automakers managed to get into the category of large SUVs:

  • Audi;
  • Porsche;
  • Volkswagen;
  • Jeep;
  • Mitsubishi;
  • BMW;
  • Subaru;
  • GMC.

A company of excellent world leading manufacturers who know a lot about saving. But their cars did not cease to be full-fledged off-road cars.

Volkswagen Amarok

Another category, which is represented by more compact SUVs or crossovers, includes models of companies:

  • Nissan;
  • Renault;
  • Ford;
  • Skoda;
  • SsangYong.

It remains only to get acquainted in detail with the leaders of the rating and find out what indicators of fuel consumption they are ready to offer to consumers.

Ford Expedition

SUVs

Let's start with the most economical SUVs that hit the top 10. These are really big cars, which, despite their solid dimensions, are capable of providing low fuel consumption. It is worth noting that we are talking about specific modifications and trim levels. There are versions that can easily burn 15 - 20 liters of fuel for every 100 kilometers traveled. And there are such car designs that can consume even less than 10 liters. That they were in the ranking of economical SUVs.

Pure

Opens the rating is not the most economical SUV, managed to get into the top 10 representative of Audi. This car is able to consume about 8.4 liters of fuel. To achieve these indicators, you should choose a version with a gasoline engine. Discounts for new cars! Profitable loan from 9.9% installments 0% adom.ru TSHI power of 252 horsepower. Despite its not the most powerful performance, such modifications are very economical and accelerate from place to hundred in 6.9 seconds.

Audi Pure

Touareg

Another German car from the company Volkswagen. Under the hood of the most economical version is a diesel engine with a volume of 3.0 liters. It is capable of producing 200 horsepower. Working in conjunction with the 8-speed automatic, the power plant consumes about 8.2 liters per 100 kilometers. The car has excellent off-road performance. If we talk about a large SUV, the Touareg rightly positioned as the most economical among all modifications of this model.

Volkswagen Touareg

Cayenne

Снова немец и снова неплохие показатели расхода топлива. На этот раз речь идёт о представителе концерна Porsche. Этот автомобиль способен потреблять 8,1 л. на 100 км. Для этого следует выбирать трёхлитровый мотор с 8-ступенчатым автоматом. Хотя он опережает тот же Pure по расходу, считаясь более экономичным, но динамика у Cayenne заметно лучше. Для разгона с места до 100 километров в час авто затрачивает 5,4 секунды. Представленные 3 автомобиля – это самые экономичные внедорожники, представляющие VAG Group. Хотя у них есть достойные конкуренты из Германии, о которых чуть позже.

Porsche Cayenne

Patriot

Автомобиль с незамысловатым названием. Только не путайте с отечественным UAZ Patriot. Тому автомобилю до этого представителя рейтинга очень далеко. Авто представлено компанией Jeep. С показателем 7,84 л. на 100 км. модель занимает достойное высокое место в рейтинге. Под капотом стоит 2,4-литровый двигатель на 172 лошадиные силы. На выбор к нему идёт шестиступенчатый автомат или механическая коробка передач. Машина очень интересная внешне и внутри. Особенно, если вы являетесь поклонником бренда Jeep. Ничего необычного, зато очень достойный расход топлива.

UAZ Patriot

Outlander

Bypassing the fuel consumption of previous competitors managed Japanese economical SUV from the company Mitsubishi. His appetite lasts for 7.6 liters per 100 km. of the way. The most economical version in terms of consumption is a 2.4-liter engine with 166 horsepower. The car is not the largest among the SUVs, which largely helped him to show good results. But the winners are not judged, because a deserved place in the top by the Japanese automaker.

Mitsubishi Outlander

X5

Its most economical SUV in 2018 offers the Bavarian concern BMW. Their car X5 is able to consume slightly less than the previous competitor. According to the test results, a value of 7.59 liters was obtained. These indicators contribute to the 3.0-liter engine with turbocharging and 8-speed transmission. Its power is 255 horsepower. Excellent gasoline power unit allows the Bavarian to keep a confident average position among the most optimal SUV fuel consumption.

BMW X5

Forester

Excellent solution in the performance of the company Subaru. This car has always been popular. It has a good cross, decent performance, roomy interior and good-quality equipment. Add to this the flow rate of 7.35 liters. on 100 km. and get one of the best representatives of Japan. These figures were achieved thanks to a 2.5-liter engine with 170 horsepower, which is complemented by a 6-speed automatic. This is a reliable car with good dynamics, which allows you to maximize the combination of efficiency and off-road qualities.

Subaru Forester

Crosstrek

Quite an interesting car, and also from the company Subaru. This standard car got a two-liter engine with 148 horsepower and a continuously variable transmission. Off-road performance at a high level, which is largely due to high clearance. Despite its more crossover characteristics, we have a full off-road car. His high place in the Crosstrek rating was due to the ability to consume about 6.92 liters of fuel for every 100 kilometers traveled.

Subaru Crosstrek

Terrain

If you look at the exterior of this large SUV with a very roomy cabin from GMC, you never think that it can consume 6.91 liters. on 100 km. But it really is. To achieve these indicators, the manufacturer installed a 2.4 liter engine under the hood, which has a capacity of 180 horsepower. Complements its six-band automat. A choice of front or four-wheel drive.

The low level of fuel consumption does not prevent the SUV from remaining incredibly roomy, practical and simply beautiful. A worthy option and a contender for leadership. But Terrain still lost to its main competitor, who eventually won the first place. Because the second, but deserved, line in the ranking.

GMC Terrain

CrossTrek Hybrid

Not entirely honest way, but still came out on top in the ranking of the most economical SUVs, another representative of Subaru. But this time we are talking about a hybrid version that can consume 6.9 liters each. per 100 kilometers. This is a full-fledged all-wheel drive off-road car with a 2.0-liter gasoline engine of 150 horsepower and an additional electric motor. The account still takes the work of the internal combustion engine, and not a cycle mixed with an electric motor. Because it was fair to put this car in the deserved first place.

The market situation is changing rapidly. Almost every day there are new cars that can beat the records of previous cars, come out on top in the ratings, and then make room for the next new product. Positions are temporary, because very soon the top 10 will consist of completely different SUVs. Current trends are aimed at reducing the amount of fuel consumed. Because the line of 6.9 liters can be easily overcome.

CrossTrek Hybrid

Crossovers

If you want to get a really low fuel consumption, but keep a good cross, it is better to pay attention to the category of crossovers. They are inferior to SUVs in overall dimensions, but sometimes show much better results in all terrain. The main argument in their favor is extremely low fuel consumption with respectable parameters. In this category, the most economical crossover SUVs are represented by 5 automakers.

Yeti

Not everyone perceives this car made by Skoda as a full-fledged SUV. And in vain. Indeed, in the lineup of modifications there is a version of 140 horsepower with a diesel engine of 2.0 liters and all-wheel drive. It is not among the most economical, but it shows excellent off-road qualities. If you choose purely fuel consumption, then the most economical will be the 1.2-liter TSI with 105 horsepower. This is a front-wheel drive, but 5.9 liters. on 100 km. To be more objective, we will include the all-wheel drive off-road version in the rating. This is the engine 140 horsepower, but with a consumption of 6.3 liters.

Skoda Yeti

Actyon

Nobody expected, but a representative of SsangYong broke into the top 5. This Korean all-wheel drive SUV is characterized by a very stylish and sporty appearance with good off-road capabilities. Actyon earned its place in the ranking with the presence of a 2.0 liter engine with 149 horsepower, four-wheel drive and a manual gearbox. In this equipment, the car demonstrates the consumption of 5.7 liters. on 100 km. Very good results and well-deserved hit in the top.

SsangYong Actyon

Plague

Excellent crossover in all respects. Despite not the largest dimensions, this creation of Ford can be called a small SUV. The car is focused on the European market, where off-road is a fairly conventional concept. But the main thing is that the car is economical and belongs to the corresponding class. To hit the top, the Plague must be equipped with a 1.6-liter gasoline EcoBoost, or a 2.0-liter TDCi diesel. Both motors give good performance. Turbodiesel 150 horsepower without problems consumes 5.5 liters. But provided that comes with a manual. Versions with automatic engines are more voracious. They need about 5.8 liters. fuel.

Ford Plague

X-Trail

Dimensions allow you to get closer to the level of a full-fledged SUV. But still we have a crossover with a good cross and economical engines. The car is perfectly adapted for urban operation, the suburbs and easy off-road. The range of engines offers a wide range of engines that can give dynamics and provide excellent acceleration.

But since we are talking about saving, we are interested in the most practical power units, allowing the car to remain an SUV. Therefore, a version with a 130-horsepower 1.6-liter engine and 320 Nm of torque hit the rating. These are very solid indicators for a modest diesel engine. With these characteristics, the actual consumption is 5.4 liters. In this regard, the car gets a well-deserved second place.

X-Trail

Duster

The other should not have been expected. This is the most economical small SUV that combines all the advantages of an off-road car and a very thrifty consumer of fuel. The French crossover from Renault from the first appearance made it clear to motorists that it is not necessary for an all-terrain vehicle to have the most powerful engines and expend tens of liters of fuel. This is the most off-road crossover among all competitors. Numerous tests and tests clearly showed how the Duster can go through the most difficult areas, snow drifts, mud and swamp. For this he does not need a high-performance motor.

To get the driver out of any situation, but at the same time spending 5.2 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers, it is enough for a French car to have an engine with a volume of 1.5 liters under the hood. This is a diesel power unit with a capacity of only 90 horsepower. Do not be fooled by this indicator, since already at 1750 rpm the engine goes to a torque of 200 Nm. A well-deserved first place in this stubborn competition.

Renault Duster

Choosing a car with off-road characteristics, do not forget for what purpose you are purchasing it. From a large SUV in the city a little confusing. Such machines are specifically designed for more difficult and demanding operating conditions. You just waste your money and minimize the true potential of the machine. At the same time, it is not worth buying crossovers and jeeps, which will have to go through difficult road sections, with low-powered powertrains. In the city they will pass without problems, show the minimum consumption. But on the roads you will immediately encounter a shortage of horsepower. When you put pressure on the gas, the engine will overload.

Therefore, it is optimal to look for something in between that can satisfy the needs of the driver for off-road qualities and fuel consumption. The presented ratings clearly demonstrated that modern SUVs can combine these two criteria.

LEAVE ANSWER